It seems to me that it depends on your perspective on whether someone is a wingnut. Though I consider myself a little conservative, I would not consider myself a wingnut. I bet you would, though. Another thing I have noticed is that it used to be that you could post anything, from any source, and thought it perfectly fine, but if someone sources something from the more conservative spectrum, you, and others, cry foul saying, "Fox new doesn't count" or, "that is a conservative blog, and give me a mainstream source." Or what recently happened to me, when I posted a flyer from a Black Panther rally that was being sponsored by the NAACP, "You need to post something from the NAACP that proves they sponsored it" when the event happened a couple of months ago. When someone sets the standard of proof, it can often be nearly impossible to prove.
And for what it is worth, if you think I am one that waits for marching orders from the conservative talk radio hosts before I post, you are sadly mistaken. Most things I post, I find myself. I may not be the most eloquent person, or may not have time to check every source, like many seem to, but I am busy. I have a family and a business that are both demanding on my time.
If you don't make someone elses life better, what good is yours?
Weighty decisions are easy to make, when you aren't burdened by all the necessary information
The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings. The inherent virtue of communism is the sharing of misery. -Winston Churchill_